Stacks and Leverette for Wheeler Council

Submitted By: safulmer2@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Voters in Wheeler are asked to elect three of four candidates to serve on City Council. I know two of the candidates well and consider them both to be ideal servants of our small town.

Heidi Stacks (pka Heidi Siglin) has lived here for almost 50 years, serving seven of those on Council. She is very well networked with other public servants in nearby cities, and has served us with extraordinary dedication and wisdom. She’s a respectful team player who listens to every view and can be counted on to do whatever is best for the town she loves.

Mary Leverette is newer to Wheeler, but has already proven herself as a devoted, consistent, constructive volunteer. She has regularly attended Council meetings for several years. She knows our issues quite well.

I’ve worked closely with both candidates on Wheeler’s Emergency Preparedness Committee and with Emergency Volunteer Corps of Nehalem Bay. They both display great creativity, commitment, and integrity. They are both hard workers who do what they say they will.

These two public servants bring the combination of experience and fresh vision that Wheeler needs. Please join me in electing both to Wheeler City Council!

IF YOU ARE PRO-CHOICE, VOTE FOR ANDY DAVIS

Submitted By: Ketzel.levine@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
IF YOU ARE PRO-CHOICE, VOTE FOR ANDY DAVIS

Once upon a time, I took for granted that Oregon law protected reproductive freedom. When Roe was overturned in June of 2022, giving states the ability to restrict abortion, I certainly worried. But not about Oregon.

In March of 2024, the fairy dust fell from my eyes. That’s when Cyrus Javadi co-sponsored Oregon Senate Bill 1536, along with his other Republican colleagues.

You’re likely unfamiliar with SB1536 because it quickly failed. And for now, that’s an enormous relief. But it’s worth noting exactly what Representative Javadi co-sponsored, even if it’s difficult to pin him down on what he actually believes.

SB1536 is designed to restrict access to abortion after a 15-week gestational period with exceptions due to an urgent health need, rape or incest.

(If you’re following the plight of women in anti-abortion states, you will know that “exceptions” allowing for pregnancy termination are at best dubious and at worst, lethal).

SB1536 also states that all abortions involving a health care provider must be reported to the Oregon Health Authority. In other words, should you be able to get an abortion after 15 weeks, your health care decision is on the record.

(It doesn’t take a lot of imagination to understand how such information might be used since it’s already happening: the punitive treatment of women seeking or having abortions).

At the recent Oct 9th Candidates Forum sponsored by the Tillamook branch of the American Association of University Women, Representative Javadi was asked if he supported a woman’s right to make her own reproductive healthcare decisions. He spoke with great compassion about young girls betrayed by the men they trusted; expressed horror that women in 12 states were facing criminal charges related to their pregnancies; and assured his audience that abortion was still legal in Oregon.

He also neglected to say that he co-sponsored SB 1536.

In a Facebook conversation that same evening, a constituent from Manzanita asked Representative Javadi a similar question. She wrote, “What’s your position on women’s reproductive rights?”

He answered that Oregon has a lot of work to do concerning women’s reproductive rights. “Too often,” he wrote, “the conversation focuses solely on access to abortion, without addressing why a woman may feel like she can’t have the child”.

Perplexed, his constituent pushed harder for clarification, writing that the bill he co-sponsored would indicate he did not support a woman’s right to choose. His response: “I did sponsor a bill limiting abortion. I didn’t realize that your definition of women’s reproductive rights is so narrowly defined”.

Cyrus Javadi defines women’s reproductive freedom as the right to have a child. What transparently evasive nonsense from such a very clever man.

The other day, I received an email from Representative Javadi responding to a piece I’d written in support of Andy Davis’s resoundingly clear support for reproductive freedom. I appreciated his comments, his corrections and his consistent championing of the needs of pregnant women before and after they give birth.

But let’s be clear. Cyrus Javadi only supports SOME pregnant women’s rights to make their own medical decisions. Planned Parenthood agrees, and lists him by name on its 2024 Abortion Ban Watch List.

If you’re looking for a State Representative who trusts ALL women, vote for Andy Davis. He is serious about reproductive rights and knows precisely how to define them.

Concerns

Submitted By: dwieb1@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
I was wrong to say there would be multiple ballots in ranked choice voting. There was a segment on Fox 12 news this morning simulating the method with candy. Simpler to follow than the explanation I saw earlier, it showed how ballots would be recounted – after eliminating a candidate with the lowest votes – using the second choice from ballots that were counted for the eliminated candidate. Rinse and repeat until one candidate has a majority of votes. So the counting process would be more difficult, but there would be only one ballot.

So I offer a much simpler example: Suppose there were 3 candidates for president and each voter was tasked with choosing from Harris, Trump, and RFK Jr.
Also for simplicity suppose there were only 1000 voters. If the first count showed 499 votes for Harris, 498 votes for Trump, and 3 votes for RFK Jr. then the process would eliminate RFK Jr. and count the second choice from those 3 ballots. That second choice could very well be for Trump, and the result would be 499 votes for Harris, and 501 votes for Trump. Trump would be declared the winner.

While that’s unlikely here in Oregon, the point is adding all this complexity leaves us vulnerable to political manipulation well beyond our understanding. We don’t need this. What we do need is more public forums to better understand what our politicians are doing and why.

We should be worried

Submitted By: barbaraandchuck@nehalemtel.net – Click to email about this post
Posting for babbles@nehalemtel.net

October 21, 2024
HEATHER COX RICHARDSON

OCT 22

On October 14, Trump told Fox News Channel host Maria Bartiromo that he thought enemies within the United States were more dangerous than foreign adversaries and that he thought the military should stop those “radical left lunatics” on Election Day. Since then, he has been talking a lot about “the enemy from within,” specifically naming Representative Adam Schiff and former House speaker Nancy Pelosi, both Democrats from California, as “bad people.” Schiff was the chair of the House Intelligence Committee that broke the 2019 story of Trump’s attempt to extort Volodymyr Zelensky that led to Trump’s first impeachment.

Trump’s references to the “enemy from within” have become so frequent that former White House press secretary turned political analyst Jen Psaki has called them his closing argument for the 2024 election, and she warned that his construction of those who oppose him as “enemies” might sweep in virtually anyone he feels is a threat.

In a searing article today, political scientist Rachel Bitecofer of The Cycleexplored exactly what that means in a piece titled “What (Really) Happens If Trump Wins?” Bitecofer outlined Adolf Hitler’s January 30, 1933, oath of office, in which he promised Germans he would uphold the constitution, and the three months he took to dismantle that constitution.
By March, she notes, the concentration camp Dachau was open. Its first prisoners were not Jews, but rather Hitler’s prominent political opponents. By April, Jews had been purged from the civil service, and opposition political parties were illegal. By May, labor unions were banned and students were burning banned books. Within the year, public criticism of Hitler and the Nazis was illegal, and denouncing violators paid well for those who did it.

Bitecofer writes that Trump has promised mass deportations “that he cannot deliver unless he violates both the Constitution and federal law.” To enable that policy, Trump will need to dismantle the merit-based civil service and put into office those loyal to him rather than the Constitution. And then he will purge his political opponents, for once those who would stand against him are purged, Trump can act as he wishes against immigrants, for example, and others.

Ninety years ago, as American reporter Dorothy Thompson ate breakfast at her hotel in Berlin on August 25, 1934, a young man from Hitler’s secret police, the Gestapo, “politely handed me a letter and requested a signed receipt.” She thought nothing of it, she said, “But what a surprise was in store for me!” The letter informed her that, “in light of your numerous anti-German publications,” she was being expelled from Germany.

She was the first American journalist expelled from Nazi Germany, and that expulsion was no small thing. Thompson had moved to London in 1920 to become a foreign correspondent and began to spend time in Berlin. In 1924 she moved to the city to head the Central European Bureau for the New York Evening Post and the Philadelphia Public Ledger. From there, she reported on the rise of Adolf Hitler. She left her Berlin post in 1928 to marry novelist Sinclair Lewis, and the two settled in Vermont.

When the couple traveled to Sweden in 1930 for Lewis to accept the Nobel Prize in Literature, Thompson visited Germany, where she saw the growing strength of the fascists and the apparent inability of the Nazi’s opponents to come together to stand against them. She continued to visit the country in the following years, reporting on the rise of fascism there, and elsewhere.

In 1931, Thompson interviewed Hitler and declared that, rather than “the future dictator of Germany” she had expected to meet, he was a man of “startling insignificance.” She asked him if he would “abolish the constitution of the German Republic.” He answered: “I will get into power legally” and, once in power, abolish the parliament and the constitution and “found an authority-state, from the lowest cell to the highest instance; everywhere there will be responsibility and authority above, discipline and obedience below.” She did not believe he could succeed: “Imagine a would-be dictator setting out to persuade a sovereign people to vote away their rights,” she wrote in apparent astonishment.

Thompson was back in Berlin in summer 1934 as a representative of the Saturday Evening Post when she received the news that she had 24 hours to leave the country. The other foreign correspondents in Berlin saw her off at the railway station with “great sheaves of American Beauty roses.”
Safely in Paris, Thompson mused that in her first years in Germany she had gotten to know many of the officials of the German republic, and that when she had left to marry Lewis, they offered “many expressions of friendship and gratitude.” But times had changed. “I thought of them sadly as my train pulled out,” she said, “carrying me away from Berlin. Some of those officials still are in the service of the German Government, some of them are émigrés and some of them are dead.”

Thompson came home to a nation where many of the same dark impulses were simmering, her fame after her expulsion from Germany following her. She lectured against fascism across the country in 1935, then began a radio program that reached tens of millions of listeners. Hired in 1936 to write a regular column three days a week for the New York Herald Tribune, she became a leading voice in print, too, warning that what was happening in Germany could also happen in America.
In an echo of Lewis’s bestselling 1935 novel It Can’t Happen Here, she wrote in a 1937 column: “No people ever recognize their dictator in advance…. He always represents himself as the instrument for expressing the Incorporated National Will. When Americans think of dictators they always think of some foreign model. If anyone turned up here in a fur hat, boots and a grim look he would be recognized and shunned…. But when our dictator turns up, you can depend on it that he will be one of the boys, and he will stand for everything traditionally American.”

In less than two years, the circulation of her column had grown to reach between seven and eight million people. In 1939 a reporter wrote: “She is read, believed and quoted by millions of women who used to get their political opinions from their husbands, who got them from [political commentator] Walter Lippmann.” The reporter likened Thompson to First Lady Eleanor Roosevelt, saying they were the two “most influential women in the U.S.”

When 22,000 American Nazis held a rally at New York City’s Madison Square Garden in honor of President George Washington’s birthday on February 20, 1939, Thompson sat in the front row of the press box, where she laughed loudly during the speeches and yelled “Bunk!” at the stage, illustrating that she would not be muzzled by Nazis. After being escorted out, she returned to her seat, where stormtroopers surrounded her. She later told a reporter: “I was amazed to see a duplicate of what I saw seven years ago in Germany. Tonight I listened to words taken out of the mouth of Adolf Hitler.”

Two years later, In 1941, Thompson returned to the issue she had raised when she mused about those government officials who had gone from thanking her to expelling her. In a piece for Harper’s Magazine titled “Who Goes Nazi?” she wrote: “It is an interesting and somewhat macabre parlor game to play at a large gathering of one’s acquaintances: to speculate who in a showdown would go Nazi,” she wrote. “By now, I think I know. I have gone through the experience many times—in Germany, in Austria, and in France. I have come to know the types: the born Nazis, the Nazis whom democracy itself has created, the certain-to-be fellow-travelers. And I also know those who never, under any conceivable circumstances, would become Nazis.”

Examining a number of types of Americans, she wrote that the line between democracy and fascism was not wealth, or education, or race, or age, or nationality. “Kind, good, happy, gentlemanly, secure people never go Nazi,” she wrote. They were secure enough to be good natured and open to new ideas, and they believed so completely in the promise of American democracy that they would defend it with their lives, even if they seemed too easygoing to join a struggle. “But the frustrated and humiliated intellectual, the rich and scared speculator, the spoiled son, the labor tyrant, the fellow who has achieved success by smelling out the wind of success—they would all go Nazi in a crisis,” she wrote. “Those who haven’t anything in them to tell them what they like and what they don’t—whether it is breeding, or happiness, or wisdom, or a code, however old-fashioned or however modern, go Nazi.”
In Paris following her expulsion from Berlin, Thompson told a reporter for the Associated Press that the reason she had been attacked was the same reason that Hitler’s power was growing. “Chancellor Hitler is no longer a man, he is a religion,” she said.
Suggesting her expulsion was because of her old article disparaging Hitler, in her own article about her expulsion she noted: “My offense was to think that Hitler is just an ordinary man, after all. That is a crime against the reigning cult in Germany, which says Mr. Hitler is a Messiah sent by God to save the German people…. To question this mystic mission is so heinous that, if you are a German, you can be sent to jail. I, fortunately, am an American, so I merely was sent to Paris. Worse things can happen….”

Beating the poor, dead horse of Manzanita Water Issues

Submitted By: mkuestner10@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
First off, I urge Manzanita voters to
VOTE YES on Referendum 29-179.

I received a pre-addressed and stamped postcard in the U.S. mail this week, requesting I choose to respond to various pre-selected sentences about Manzanita’s water allocations and send the postcard to a Manzanita resident.

The Manzanita resident, a Mr. Kugler, who has exhibited a bizarre ongoing obsession with Manzanita water issues, continues to advance ill-advised, poorly-informed and malicious attacks directed at our City Council, our Mayor and our City Manager. These attacks also continue to exhibit either astounding ignorance about Oregon municipal budgetary rules and procedures, or deliberate obfuscation of these rules and procedures.

It is unclear why Manzanita residents would funnel any of their views through an individual with a demonstrated long-standing animus towards our city, its elected/appointed leaders and city staff (he is currently a party to a lawsuit against Manzanita as well). Between this lawsuit and the referendum, he has cost the City (and all of us) over $30,000 in legal fees just since July.

To better understand our city budget, it is probably best to go straight to those who know most about it: our Budget Committee representatives, our City Council/Mayor and/or our City Manager. Specific meetings of the Budget Committee that cover all aspects of planning and recommendations for each fiscal year can be located at:

ci.manzanita.or.us/budget-committee/ The January to May meetings cover most issues, with a final meeting with City Council where they vote to approve the new fiscal year budget, usually in May/June.

The above information is important to examine and to understand, since the Budget Committee and our City Council are responsible by State Law to assure that Manzanita’s budget is accurate, balanced and fiscally stable. They can’t just present opinions as facts and get away with it or they’ll get in trouble with the State of Oregon.

The Budget Committee examines, questions, analyzes and then forwards its recommendations for annual budgetary approval by the city council every year, by Oregon law. Each year, this includes all aspects of Manzanita’s budget, including issues related to its Water Fund as well as indirect cost allocations.

For many years, the Budget Committee has been bombarded with complaints from resident Kugler that there are parts of the indirect cost allocation methodology, and/or the Manzanita Water Fund that are wrong. Each year, the Budget Committee makes sure that this is not true. And each year, they are correct. And each year, resident Kugler is proven incorrect.

Please communicate with trustworthy, knowledgeable friends, and then double-check your information with our city government.
Happy sleuthing!
Mark Kuestner
Manzanita resident

Why I voted ANDY DAVIS FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE

Submitted By: caroltov@pacifier.com – Click to email about this post
Friends,
I just voted for ANDY DAVIS FOR OREGON HOUSE REPRESENTATIVE for District 32, Tillamook and Clatsop Counties.

I know and have worked with Andy and have great respect for him as a person of Integrity, a trait much needed especially these days.

Andy is a longtime community leader and volunteer. He’s a Democrat and a city councilor in Astoria. He served on the Clatsop County budget committee and comprehensive plan update committees, dealing with finances, agencies and challenging problems. He’s focused on affordable housing, healthcare for everyone and more.

Andy is responsible, responsive, reliable and honest. He will make an outstanding legislator who will serve all Oregonians.

For more details on Andy’s campaign: www.davis4oregon.com/

The seat is currently held by Republican Cyrus Javadi. Javadi is anti-choice, and signed a letter supporting Texas Gov. Abbott’s extreme anti-immigrant policies. He also failed to show up for a number of votes in the last legislative session. He is not a moderate and does not represent me or many of you I suspect.

We need a smart, thoughtful, hard working, accessible Representative – ELECT ANDY DAVIS. Vote EARLY and Spread the word.

Let’s take back our Oregon House Seat and make a difference.
carol

MARY LEVERETTE for Wheeler City Council

Submitted By: birkowitz119@icloud.com – Click to email about this post
Even local elections are peppered with candidates who holding a narrow view or entrenched on a single issue…elections in our small coastal towns are no exception. Having served on City Council previously, I know this to be true.

MARY LEVERETTE is a highly intelligent and dedicated citizen of Wheeler. She has shown her volunteer spirit and open mind for close to a decade. Mary is creative, yet structured, in her approach, and will always listen to those who are open to creating a better place to live and work.

I trust Mary to always put the interests and needs of Wheeler first, and to work tirelessly towards goals which will offer value to each and every citizen.

Please vote for MARY LEVERETTE for Wheeler City Council on November 5th

Thank you

When Our Life Is Political

Submitted By: jettkeyser@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
                
          

The Price of Awakening

In time we come to know, welcome in our daily lives

the understanding that there is no saving grace

in misleading. Deep and real differences may define

our families and friendships but we realize

there will be no lasting peace in lies and using others.

Anchoring these times and spaces of our lives, 

we can listen to the timeless voices of ancestors

and the integrity of respected friends, “Through love alone

will hate be healed.” We all know we have awakened

many times before, left behind a passing ignorance,

the restless ways of wanting, hatred, and fear. Slowly,

we are abandoning the belief that a man or woman can

own another, assume or create a relation that does not

recognize the inherent rights and dignity of the other.

At work, as in marriage, our community, and civic relations,

this entitlement is now a birthright, an achievement of what

is best in all of us. We are awakening, slowly reaching

the understanding that war is not sustainable.

The war in Vietnam, the war in Iraq, Gaza, wherever conflict

appears, we are coming to know that war profits

a very small minority. For too long we have listened to

to all their lies, the reasons why our sons and daughters

must continue to be sacrificed for profit,  why it is

that those who have had the most, generation after

generation, merit further privileges to accumulate more.

There is no saving grace in being misled. We are also awakening

to the precious and fragile gift of our democracy, how our voice

and vote is equal to any other. Will it ever be easy to recognize,

accept, and release how we have been deceived?

Each of us knows a deeply visceral answer to this question.

But as the typhoons come and the tornadoes grow stronger,

as species extinction accelerates, and our divorce rates 

incline, as our coastal cities submerge and our mothers and 

fathers die of unrelenting heat, we can awaken, recognize 

how we have been used. What comes to mind when we hear

their deceitful and barren platforms full of hateful intentions?

They assert that we should deport millions of men and women,

persons who are seeking, as we have sought, a better life,

or listening to their call for ever deeper extraction of oil and gas,

what comes to mind is a wounded little boy stepping down

from a now infamous bus, “They just let you do it.”  May we all

be granted the integrity to awaken and unity be restored.

Was VIRGINIA a diabetic?

Submitted By: jginmanz@spectrum.net – Click to email about this post
www.kff.org/policy-watch/the-facts-about-the-35-insulin-copay-cap-in-medicare/

This brief walks through the facts about actions taken under both the Trump and Biden Administrations related to capping insulin copayments for people with Medicare and explains the differences between their approaches.

What did the Trump Administration do?

What did the Biden Administration do?

What are the key differences between these approaches?

What the November election could mean for people who need insulin.

NO VIRGINIA. BIDEN DID NOT……..

Submitted By: dixiedarrow@icloud.com – Click to email about this post
……….lower insulin costs!
Under President Trump’s leadership, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) announced that over 1,750 standalone Medicare Part D prescription drug plans and Medicare Advantage plans with prescription drug coverage have applied to offer lower insulin costs through the Part D Senior Savings Model for the 2021 plan year. The model follows on the Trump Administration’s previously announced 13.5 percent decline in the average monthly basic Part D premium since 2017 to the lowest level in seven years.

The above is from: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
President Trump Announces Lower Out of Pocket Insulin Costs for Medicare’s Seniors

Before Covid hit: Under Trump, America gained 7 million new jobs – more than three times government experts’ projections.
For many more Trump positive efforts to help Americans see:

trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/trump-administration-accomplishments/

North Tillamook County Women’s Association

Submitted By: NTCWA1933@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Join us for the Nov. meeting, on Tuesday Nov. 5, 1, 12 – 2:00 at the Pine Grove Community House, in Manzanita. Meetings are open to the public. Or come for the program at 1:00: Jeff Warren discusses a wide range of honey topics, including what to look for in labeling, fake honey, and more. Then we’ll taste five different honeys. As it’s election day, we’ll vote on our favorite honey! www.ntcwa1933.org ntcwa1933@gmail.com

Passing the Torch

Submitted By: leveretteforwheeler@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Passing the Torch.

Dear Friends and Wheeler neighbors,

As some of you may know I will not be seeking re-election as your mayor this November. But, my heart and mind will always be thinking about our fair city. I want to do what I can to ensure a bright future for Wheeler. To that end I am enthusiastically endorsing Mary Leverette for City Council. She is a dedicated volunteer for our city and has proven her devotion and value through thousands of hours of service.

Mary has attended almost every Council meeting over the past two years. She listens and asks critical questions. She asks for clarification of difficult issues. For three years she has coordinated the Annual Wheeler Cleanup Day — it’s no small feat lining up haulers and volunteers to make the effort a success.

Mary is also on the City’s Emergency Preparedness Committee. She recently held a number of meetings to familiarize neighbors with the local emergency supplies and to inspire us to begin setting up our own emergency plans. The meetings had a greater goal: to urge neighbors to get to know one another — surely a good thing to do in any circumstance.

Mary is working hard to create community and unity. She will be an advocate for Wheeler. She will work to understand the challenging issues. She will make her voice heard when questions need to be asked. I trust that she will work to make Wheeler a better, safer place to live, work and visit.

I’m voting for Mary Leverette for Wheeler City Council, and I humbly ask you to join me. Let’s make sure Wheeler is in good hands.

Clif Kemp, Mayor of the City of Wheeler

Staff wanted at BAYBAY furniture and homewares in Nehalem

Submitted By: ali.stewart@me.com – Click to email about this post
BAYBAY is a furniture, homewares and plant store in Nehalem.
We are currently looking for a new team member to work alternate weekends (at minimum, more weekends available).
A reliable, friendly individual who can run the store alone on Saturdays and Sundays 10-4.
A passion for homewares and decor would be ideal, but retail experience is not necessary (our system is very easy to work with).
Please get in touch for immediate start at hello@baybay.shop
Looking forward to hearing from you!
Ali & Tama

Save and Share Old Video and Audio

Submitted By: nehalembayexperience@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Hi my name is Drew and I am a local video tech/creator. Passing on memories of family, friends and experiences is so important as it explains who we are and where we come from. This is how I can help.
VIDEO 8mm-VHS-DVD converted to MP4.
AUDIO cassette, CD, vinyl converted to MP3.
All files are delivered on a Flash Drive.
It is not expensive and it’s local. Cheers, Drew.

A vote for Kamala Harris is a vote for democracy

Submitted By: babbles@nehalemtel.net – Click to email about this post
To viewers in BBQ-land,

Heather Cox Richardson is a political journalist. I am posting excerpts from her 10/18 newsletter: “Letters from an American.”

I am posting excerpts, not to in any way deceive you, but for the sake of clarity and brevity.

When he took office in January 2021, with democracy under siege from autocratic governments abroad and an authoritarian movement at home, President Joe Biden set out to prove that democracy could deliver for the ordinary people who had lost faith in it. $35 insulin, new bridges, loan forgiveness, higher wages, good jobs—policies designed to benefit ordinary people have demonstrated that a democratic government can improve lives.

The administration “has driven a historic economic recovery” with strong growth, very low unemployment rates, and inflation returning to normal. Now it is focused on lowering costs for families and expanding the economy while reducing inequality.

Although democracy has been delivering for Americans, Donald Trump and MAGAs rose to power by convincing those left behind by 40 years of supply-side economics that their problem was not the people in charge of the government, but rather the government itself.

Trump wants to get rid of the current government so that he can enrich himself, do whatever he wants to his enemies, and avoid answering to the law.

Trump and Vance’s outlandish lies about the federal response to Hurricane Helene are designed to override the reality of a competent administration addressing a crisis with all the tools it has. In its place, the lies provide a false narrative of federal officials ignoring people and trying to steal their property.

In an article in US News and World Report yesterday, NBC’s former chief marketer John D. Miller apologized to America for helping to “create a monster.” Miller led the team that marketed The Apprentice, the reality TV show that made Trump a household name. “To sell the show,” Miller wrote, “we created the narrative that Trump was a super-successful businessman who lived like royalty.” But the truth was that he declared bankruptcy six times.

Miller says they “promoted the show relentlessly,” blanketing the country with a “highly exaggerated” image of Trump as a successful businessman “like a heavy snowstorm.” “[W]e…did irreparable harm by creating the false image of Trump as a successful leader,” Miller wrote. “I deeply regret that. And I regret that it has taken me so long to go public.”

Speaking as a “born-and-bred Republican,” Miller warned: “If you believe that Trump will be better for you or better for the country, that is an illusion.” He strongly urged people to vote for Kamala Harris. “The country will be better off and so will you.”

Forbes and Newsweek have recently questioned Trump’s mental health; yesterday the Boston Globe ran an op-ed saying, “Trump’s decline is too dangerous to ignore. We can see the decline in the former president’s ability to hold a train of thought, speak coherently, or demonstrate a command of the English language, to say nothing of policy.”

Lucy Brook
Nehalem resident

The Return of Friends to Wheeler

Submitted By: pattyrinehart@nehalemtel.net – Click to email about this post
Thank you to all the bulb customers from Wheeler at the Handy Creek Bakery on this past Thursday. Friends of North County Recreation District (NCRD) will be back at Handy Creek Bakery again on Saturday, October 19th from 9 AM to Noon. The bulbs have been delivered and now need to be sorted into the individual orders. Most of that will happen on Monday as Friends will be gathering in the kitchen of NCRD to bag them for orders. Friends of NCRD are selling top-size flower bulbs to beautify you home in the coming spring months. According to our clients over the years, these bulbs produce jaw dropping flowers. For the most part these bulbs come from the Netherlands via ship. The company we buy from started in the Netherlands in 1912. After WWII the company came to the United States. In the States the family loaded their car up with bulbs and drove from one customer to the next to peddle their products. Of their 5 children their youngest son Tim became a bulb merchant, carrying on the family tradition. The company is still family owned. Can you imagine the bulbs come from across the pond, approximately 3,500 miles across the Atlantic Ocean. Arriving at a port near New York City and then up to Bridgeport, CT., about another 65 miles. From Bridgeport to Manzanita, the driving miles are about 3034 miles. Give or take these bulbs have come 6,600 plus miles to get to Friends of North County Recreation District. Friends raises money to support programs and projects taking place at NCRD. Thank you for supporting us so we can support NCRD. So, see you Saturday morning, 9-noon, at the Handy Creek Bakery in Wheeler.

follow the money

Submitted By: codger817@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
I find that the real truth in politics is not always accessible by listening to the candidate. I believe the old cliché about “follow the money” is a good way to see who the candidate resonates with.
I also believe that following the voting record tells you a lot about an incumbent.
Oregon makes it fairly easy to follow both the money and the voting.
Oregon is strict about reporting campaign contributions. If somebody wants to make a $2 donation at the TillCoDems office, they need to identify themselves on a form to satisfy Orestar rules set by the Oregon Secretary of State.
But if you want to give to a PAC (Political Action Committee) you can blur your identity and the amount of money you give. Cyrus Javadi has collected more than one million dollars from various PAC’s. They have benign sounding names like “Restore Balance to Salem Pac”.
If you go to the Secretary of State site listed below, a search form will be brought up. secure.sos.state.or.us/orestar/gotoPublicTransactionSearchResults.do In the bottom part of the form, if you type in “Cyrus for Oregon” in the name block and click on “Search”, 172 donations in random order are displayed There is a button on the screen that allows you to export the completed form to your computer in Excel spreadsheet format. Once the form is in that format, you can use the sort function of the spreadsheet to make better sense of who gave what. And you can total it.
So far, Cyrus Javadi has collected just over a million dollars. His biggest contributor is “Bring Balance to Salem Pac”. A better name for the PAC might be “Phil Knight and his rich buddies”. “Bring Balance to Salem” has contributed $418,000 to Dr. Javadi. It’s no wonder that I seem to receive a mailer each day and when I check football scores on the internet, a slick but deceptive negative ad about his opponent pops up.
Dr. Javadi’s voting record is also suspect. He trumpets what he has done, but I fail to see how he has had a single deciding vote in the last session. The Oregonian maintains a great site that tracks voting by individual legislators. gov.oregonlive.com/legislators/Cyrus-Javadi/page-8/
I was alarmed to see in the last sessions 281 votes, Dr. Javadi was “excused” for 62 of them (22%). 33 were just plain “Excused” and 29 were “Excused for House Business”. I have to wonder. Dr. Javadi is on three committees and David Gomberg, another coastal Oregon Representative, is on six committees. David Gomberg did not miss a single vote.
Dr. Javadi’s opponent, Andy Davis, is running against him with less than $17K. Andy Davis will be a full-time legislator because conflict of interest statutes demand he quit his job as an analyst for the state.
Let’s send a message to the big money interests that want to buy our votes and send Andy Davis to Salem.
As always, discussion is welcome at codger817@gmail.com

Concerns

Submitted By: dwieb1@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Reply to Concerns about lies in the Oregon Voter Pamphlet

Strategic omissions are another common misleading tactic in politics. I noticed with this measure 117 the plan will require multiple ballots to settle one issue or determine one winner. That is not apparent to the casual voter. It would add a lot of cost to each election.

Townsend House and Pet Sitting Service

Submitted By: townntap13@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Hi! we are a reliable, truth-worthy, honest, dependable and many more couple. if your in need of a vacation and anything and can’t take your furry family member look no further. we can help you out and the community. we love and like our communities and there furry family members. we also have references and many more.

Sign theft

Submitted By: codger817@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
As a Democratic Party volunteer, I post the election signs on the lot just south of Tillamook. I have replaced signs 5 times this election season. And I will replace them again when I summon the time and energy.
I have to wonder at the mindset of the perpetrators. I’m sure they must think they are justified in their acts of vandalism and theft.
I believe their actions are more like a petulant 3th grader than those of a responsible adult. Maybe it has something to do with their political persuasion.
My question to them is simply, “Who raised you?”
Sincerely.
Jim Heffernan
Tillamook, Oregon

Measure 117 Does NOT Force Voters To Do Anything

Submitted By: hatallman@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Thank you to Barbara for pointing out the blatant falsehoods in the Voters Pamphlet for the upcoming election regarding Measure 117.

Ranked Choice Voting does NOT force voters to vote for more than one candidate. Ranked Choice Voting ALLOWS voters to rank candidates in order of preference.

While there are legitimate arguments against RCV, these outright lies do not help Oregonians make informed decisions.

Here is a 2.5 minute video which succinctly explains the process of Ranked Choice Voting.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Z2fRPRkWvY

Measure 117 is about improving our electoral process, not any particular party or issue. Let’s cut out the lying and disinformation and have a conversation about what RCV does and doesn’t do. I’d love to hear some arguments against 117 on this forum…

-Hank Tallman

Leaving it to Leverette.

Submitted By: leveretteforwheeler@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Leaving it to Leverette.

After hearing her name numerous times over the past four years, I had the opportunity to spend some time with City Council candidate, Mary Leverette. I was already impressed with her work on emergency preparedness and the city clean up. Mary has taken on these initiatives with vigor. Acting in the role of everyday citizen, Mary helped to move these important projects forward and they are now staples in our community.

We chatted for a while and Mary proved to be very knowledgeable about numerous city issues. She understands the complexities, the challenges, and most importantly, the possibilities facing our community. Wheeler will be better with Mary’s participation. I will be voting for Mary Leverette for Wheeler City Council this election, and I encourage all Wheeler voters to do the same.

With respect,

Former Wheeler Mayor Stevie Stephens Burden

Ballots dropped on the 15th.

Submitted By: moovoter@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
Ballots dropped on October 15th and many of us will have them in our mail boxes today.

If your city didn’t hold a forum, or you didn’t have the ability to get to one of the live forums, you can learn a lot about many of the candidates and measures on MooVoter.

MooVoter is a resource for Tillamook County voters that can be found on Facebook. We show who is running for what, and who they are running against. We also show measures that are specific to Tillamook County, and have links to the filings so that you can learn more.

Members ask questions, or offer comments or reactions. Candidates are welcome to answer those questions. All candidates are sent an email to let them know that they are represented in the forum. They are also tagged within a post if possible. Some candidates respond, some don’t. We consider that their answer.

The page is color coded to make it easy to find what matters to you.
Manzanita – Red Background
Water Measure
Unopposed Mayor
2 unopposed Council seats
Nehalem – Orange Background
Psilocybin Measure
Unopposed Mayor
3 people running for 1 Council seat
2 people running for a second Council seat
Wheeler – Yellow Background
2 people running for Mayor
4 people running for 3 Council seats
Rockaway – Green Background
3 people running for Mayor
1 unopposed Council seat
4 Council seat races of two people each
Garibaldi – Blue Background
Unopposed Mayor
3 people running for 1 Council seat
Bay City – Purple Background
Unopposed Mayor
3 unopposed Council seats
Tillamook – Violet Background
2 people running for 1 council seat
3 unopposed Council seats
County – Light Grey with agency logo
Emergency Radio Equipment Measure
Unopposed Sheriff
Unopposed County Clerk
3 people running for a seat on TPUD
2 people running for a 2nd seat on TPUD
House District 32 – White with Dark Blue Detail
2 people running for 1 seat

MooVoter offers no opinions, just information and the chance to ask questions. Please join in: Question. Endorse. Oppose. Observe. Be Kind.

facebook.com/groups/moovoter

Get some answers and get those ballots in!

Concerns about lies in the Oregon Voter Pamphlet

Submitted By: barbaraandchuck@nehalemtel.net – Click to email about this post
Perusing the Oregon Voter’s Pamphlet I came across something that concerns and disturbs me regarding the Arguments in Opposition for Measure 117, which would give voters the option to rank candidates when voting.

Here is a quote from the Explanatory Statement (pg 61 of the Voter’s Pamphlet):
“With ranked choice voting, voters MAY rank candidates for office in order of preference. Voters MAY choose to rank multiple candidate or ONLY ONE CANDIDATE for each office, as well as write-in candidate(s).” Capitals are my emphasis.

I counted 11 Arguments in Opposition that stated a voter must rank all candidates, which according to the above quote is obviously not true.

Since the Explanatory Statement is very clear, I have to believe that the authors deliberately lied. And if they lied about something so obvious, what else might they be lying about?

I for one have had ENOUGH of lying; of people saying anything they want, repeatedly, to get you to believe their lies. It’s a page out of Hitler’s play book.

Please read the Voter’s Pamphlet CAREFULLY and VOTE.

Full disclosure—I haven’t decided yet how I will vote on Measure 117. In theory it sounds good and that it would give independent candidates a better chance of winning which I support. I do have some concerns about this particular process—it is only for some candidates, it is confusing and it will probably be costly monetarily.

Here are quotes from those in opposition.
“RCV (ranked choice voting) disenfranchises voters. Voters must rank ALL candidates” Karen Schmidlin page 79. Capitals are hers.

“The voters want to make their choices and not be forced into ranking or voting for ALL candidates, including the people they do NOT want to vote for.” John F Woods pages 80-81. Capitals are his.

“RCV lays the foundation for ballots to NOT be counted. RCV requires every candidate to be ranked. If a voter fails to rank a candidate the entire ballot is discarded.” Suni B Danforth page 81. Capital are theirs. “Every” and “entire ballot is discarded” were underlined.

“RCV will: Force you to select candidates you don’t support.” Mary Chalkiopoulos page 82 (in bold and underlined.)

“It can be confusing when voters must rank multiple candidates instead of just choosing the one they want.” Elaine M Woods pages 82 and 83.

“If there is a slate of five candidates, you must rank them 1 to 5. If you want to only vote for one of the candidates and, consequently, not rank the other four, you ballot will be thrown out.” Lynn K Harris page 83

“RCV forces you to rank all candidates even if you do not want to vote for them.” Jennifer Adishian pages 84 and 85.

“Measure 117 makes it HARDER to VOTE. First, it will take longer to fill out a ballot because every candidate in a race must be ranked—you cannot just pick your favorite candidate and move on. Second, because each candidate must be ranked, from most favorite to least favorite, many more mistakes can be made.” Eric W Reschke, Werner For Oregon pages 86 and 87. Capitals are his.

“The biggest problem with RCV is that is FORCES you to rank ALL candidates, including the people you do NOT want to vote for.” Kim Rice. Page 89. Capitals are theirs.

“With RCV, you need to rank everyone running for each race.” Patty DeBois page 89.

“In rank choice voting, voters rank candidates for an office from first to last.” Darlene Karner page 90.

“RCV requires voters to rank candidates in order of preference.” Mary Loseke page 93

Barbara McLaughlin

Vote

Submitted By: mkuestner10@gmail.com – Click to email about this post
There are important votes coming up locally for Manzanita voters this November: Two city council positions and the position of mayor of Manzanita. In addition to these three, there is a referendum on the ballot asking us to vote YES on monthly water billing (Measure 29-179)

Measure 29-179 will only impact when we get billed for water–if it passes we’ll be billed monthly, if it fails we’ll be billed quarterly. The $ amount that we are charged for water we use will not change regardless of the vote.

Tom Campbell and Jerry Spegman are running unopposed for [their current] open city council positions. Kathryn Stock is running unopposed for [her current] position of Mayor.

All three of these candidates are excellent choices as our representatives. They have proven their value by representing us ably, with wisdom, humor and hard work. We are lucky to have such high-caliber volunteers. Integrity matters.

Please vote:

YES on Measure 29-179

And big YESSES:

Tom Campbell
Jerry Spegman
Kathryn Stock